Our perspective on
character is
anchored in an
Aristotelian view of
ethics and virtue.
In The Nicomachean
Ethics, Aristotle
(1998) gives us the
core aspects of the
person of virtue or
character. He
describes how a
person must be
willing to
consistently
evaluate his or her
situation in order
to behave in the
appropriate way
based on the context
in which the
behavior is taking
place. The actor
must react to the
situation with the
appropriate levels
of the appropriate
virtues.
For us, the core
dimensions of
character are
values, moral
development, and
intellectual ability
(Gavin, 2002).
The operational
measures of these
three dimensions are
Self-Transcendent
Values (Schwartz,
1992, 1994), Moral
Approbation (Ryan &
Riordan, 2000) and
Emotional
Intelligence, or
competence (Salovey,
Mayer, Goldman,
Turvey & Palfai,
1997). We believe
that character and
personal integrity
give the autonomous,
self-reliant
individual the
positive core
strength
(psychological
backbone) to act
rightly in the face
of wrong. So, when
an employee gives a
negative response to
organizational
pathology (e.g.,
refuses to comply
with an unethical
request), that
negative response is
in fact a “positive”
or healthy response
to be affirmed.
Joanne H. Gavin
Marist College
School of Management
3399 North Road
Poughkeepsie, NY
12601
Phone: (845)
575-3000 Ext. 2908
FAX: (845) 575-3640
Center for
Positive Organizational Scholarship • Stephen M. Ross School of Business
• University of Michigan
701 Tappan Street • Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234 • Phone:
734-647-8154 • Fax: 734-615-4323
Email:
positiveorg@umich.edu
• Projects Coordinator:
Janet Max