
Leslie Sekerka
and David
Cooperrider
Case Western Reserve
University
Cleveland, Ohio
The Appreciative
Approach to
Organizational
Development:
A Catalyst to
Well-Being and
Creativity in the
Workplace
dlc6@po.cwru.edu

Our current research
embraces a basic
tenet of Positive
Psychology
(PP)—focusing on the
positive is a
starting point for
understanding and
fostering
well-being. The
purpose of this work
has been to
demonstrate how this
tenet applies to
change in the
workplace, an
environment where
most adults spend a
large portion of
their daily lives.
Existent workplace
change efforts often
focus on identifying
the negative and
fixing such
deficiencies.
In this work,
Fredrickson’s (2001)
broaden-and-build
theory was used as a
framework to propose
that an
organizational
change intervention
that focuses on
identifying positive
aspects of the work
environment and
cultivates
individuals’ moments
of satisfaction and
appreciation, will
contribute to
enhanced cognitive
abilities such as
broader and more
flexible thinking.
The study was
designed to advance
cutting edge work in
the field of
positive
organizational
scholarship by
exercising and
extending this
theory; multiple
methods including
self-reports on
emotion and
physiological
correlates were
used. By converging
research on
organizational
behavior, emotions,
psychology, and
cardiology, we hope
to illustrate how an
appreciative
approach to change
is a catalyst for
the best of human
functioning.
In conjunction with
the Department of
Veterans Health
Administration and
the Institute of
HeartMath, an
experiment was
conducted at the VA
medical center in
Washington, D.C
(Fall, 2001). The
experiment compared
an appreciative
approach toward
change to a more
traditional
workplace
intervention derived
from a deficit-based
model. The latter
has long dominated
intervention
modalities in the
field of
organizational
development and
typically moves to
identify problems
with the intention
of improved
functioning (e.g.,
French & Bell,
1973). It is
proposed that if
individuals are
asked to focus on
high points at work
rather than
problems, positive
emotions and
favorably valanced
self-schemas
(Markus, 1977) will
emerge. In turn,
this is expected to
cultivate cognitive
structures that
foster creativity
(Torrance, 1966).
Cooperrider’s
Appreciative Inquiry
(2000), an
intervention
practice that
involves recalling
the best of one’s
organizational
experience as a
starting point, is
hypothesized to
serve as a catalyst
for increased
positive affect
(PA), decreased
negative affect
(NA), and a
healthier heart rate
variability (HRV).
Given that
appreciative
thoughts are known
to reduce stress via
a favorable
influence to ANS
activity, this work
predicts that the
appreciative
approach will have a
beneficial impact on
parasympathetic and
sympathetic HRV (McCraty,
Atkinson, Tiller,
Rein, & Watkins,
1995). Resulting
favorable affective
states are expected
to be associated
with a more positive
view of self (Ruvolo
& Markus, 1992) and
combined, serve to
increase creative
thinking (e.g., Isen,
Daubman & Nowicki,
1987).
Study results are
expected to
contribute to
current knowledge in
positive
organizational
scholarship by
exercising and
extending the
broaden-and-build
theory (Fredrickson,
2001) to consider
impacts of both
increases to PA and
decreases to NA as
contributing
components to
favorable affective
state. Preliminary
research supports
the contention that
focusing on the best
of one’s
organization
significantly
decreases
self-reported NA (Sekerka,
Cooperrider, Wilken,
2001). It is hoped
that this research
will help us
demonstrate how
beneficial changes
to emotions occur
cognitively as well
as physiologically
during the
intervention
process.
This is the first
known field
experiment where
this combination of
measures is used to
assess
organizational
change techniques.
Our contention is
that positive
reflections
contribute to a
healthier and more
effective
intervention
process. By asking
positive questions
to promote
organizational
change, we may
indeed learn how to
illuminate a pathway
toward favorable
affective states,
which will help move
individuals toward
the co-creation of
beneficial system
transformation (Csikszentmihalyi,
1997).
References
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
(1997). Finding
flow: the psychology
of engagement with
everyday life. NY:
Basic Books, Inc.
Cooperrider, D. L.,
Sorensen, P. F.,
Whitney, D., Yaeger,
T. F. (2000).
Appreciative
inquiry: Rethinking
human organization
toward a positive
theory of change.
Champaign, IL:
Stipes Publishing.
Fredrickson, B. L.
(2001). The role of
positive emotions in
positive psychology:
The
broaden-and-build
theory of positive
emotions. American
Psychologist, 56(3),
218-226.
French, W. L., &
Bell, C. H. (1973).
Organization
development:
Behavioral science
interventions for
organization
improvement.
Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Isen, A. M., Daubman,
K. A., & Nowicki, G.
P. (1987). Positive
affect facilitates
creative problem
solving. Journal of
Personality and
Social Psychology,
52, 1122-1131.
Markus, H. (1977).
Self-schemata and
processing
information about
the self. Journal of
Personality and
Social Psychology,
35(2), 63-78.
McCraty, R.,
Atkinson, M.,
Tiller, W., Rein, G.
& Watkins, A. D.
(November, 1995).
The effects of
emotions on
short-term power
spectrum analysis of
heart rate
variability. The
American Journal of
Cardiology, 76(14),
1089-1093.
Ruvolo, A. P., &
Markus, H. R.
(1992). Possible
selves and
performance: The
power of
self-relevant
Imagery. Social
Cognition, 10(1),
95-124.
Sekerka, L. E.,
Cooperrider, D. L.,
& Wilken, J. A.
(2001). An
appreciative
approach to
organizational
intervention: A
catalyst to
well-being and
creativity in the
workplace. Poster
session presented at
the Positive
Psychology Summit,
Washington D. C.
(October).
Torrance, E. P.
(1966). Torrance
tests of creative
thinking. Princeton,
NJ: Personal Press,
Inc.
|