iMpact
LOGIN
Link My iMpact  
Link Strategic Positioning Tool Kit  
To Executive Education
To Kresge Library

Diagnosis: McCain's Health Care Plan Critical

10/21/2008 --

Professor Tom Buchmueller offers ways to improve John McCain's health plan.

ANN ARBOR, Mich.---Under Sen. John McCain's health care plan, more Americans may be able to get medical coverage, at least initially, but the gains will be negligible---and within five years, fewer Americans will be covered, says a University of Michigan business professor.

McCain's plan would tax the premiums paid by employers for providing group health coverage to employees, replace the tax exclusion with a refundable tax credit for those who purchase coverage, and deregulate nongroup (i.e., nonemployer) insurance by permitting the purchase of policies across state lines.

However, eliminating the tax exclusion would greatly reduce the number of people who obtain health insurance through their employers because the price of job-based coverage would increase. In addition, administrative costs are much higher and benefits are lower for coverage in the nongroup market.

"Moving toward a relatively unregulated nongroup market will tend to raise costs, reduce the generosity of benefits and leave people with fewer consumer protections," said Thomas Buchmueller, the Waldo O. Hildebrand Professor of Risk Management and Insurance at U-M's Ross School of Business.

Buchmueller and colleagues Sherry Glied of Columbia University, Anne Royalty of Indiana University-Purdue University in Indianapolis and Katherine Swartz of Harvard University dissect McCain's health proposal in the current issue of the journal Health Affairs.

They say that, under the McCain plan, 20 million Americans would lose their current job-based health coverage because of the elimination of tax subsidies to employers. On the other hand, they estimate that 21 million people (including some who are currently uninsured and some who would lose employer-group coverage) would enroll in nongroup coverage.

"Initially, this loss of job-based coverage would be offset by an increase in coverage in the nongroup market---although not necessarily the same individuals," Buchmueller said. "Within five years, however, the net effect of the plan is expected to be a net reduction in coverage relative to what would have been observed if the tax treatment of employer-sponsored coverage remains as it now.

"The decline of job-based coverage would force millions of Americans into the weakest segment of the private insurance system---the nongroup market---where cost sharing is high and covered services are limited. Senator McCain's proposal to deregulate this market would mean that people in it would lose protections they now have. These changes would diminish the security of coverage for most Americans, especially those who are not---or someday will not be---in perfect health."

Buchmueller and colleagues offer several ways to improve McCain's plan: 1) implement a publicly funded reinsurance program for the nongroup market that would make it easier for higher-risk people to by coverage; 2) develop a set of health insurance purchasing organizations that would enable people to more easily shop for and enroll in coverage in the nongroup market using their tax credits; 3) modify the tax credits so that the value of the credit is greatest for those with low incomes, thereby increasing the number of people who could afford to purchase coverage; and 4) index the size of the tax credit to the cost of health care, which would check the extent to which coverage would erode over time.

Read Buchmueller's study, "Cost and Coverage Implications of the McCain Plan to Restructure Health Insurance."

Read companion study, "The Obama Plan: More Regulation, Unsustainable Spending," co-written by Hanns Kuttner, a McCain adviser and former senior research associate at the U-M Economic Research Initiative on the Uninsured.



For more information, contact:
Bernie DeGroat, (734) 936-1015 or 647-1847, bernied@umich.edu